Influence of Gmelina arborea and Khaya senegalensis as Agroforestry Based System on Yield Component of Maize (Zea mays) in Borno State, Nigeria
PDF

Keywords

Agroforestry,
Environmental sustainability,
Manure rates,
Plantation,
Yield

How to Cite

Goni, B., Isah, M., Daya, H.A., & Aliyu, A. (2025). Influence of Gmelina arborea and Khaya senegalensis as Agroforestry Based System on Yield Component of Maize (Zea mays) in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Forest Science and Environment, 10(1), 66–70. Retrieved from https://jfse.org.ng/index.php/home/article/view/36

Abstract

The study assessed the influence of Gmelina arborea and Khaya senegalensis, as agroforestry based systems on yield components of maize in Borno State, Nigeria. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), and data on growth and yield parameters were collected and analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), mean separation were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Results indicated that Maize grown under Gmelina arborea exhibited higher growth and yield compared to Khaya senegalensis. Moreover, increasing manure rates improved plant height, number of leaves, and cob length, while reducing days to maturity, silking, and the anthesis-silking interval. The highest cob yield (2481.8 kg/ha), grain yield (1859.5 kg/ha), and hundred seed weight (169.33 g) were recorded at 60.0 t/ha manure rate, which significantly outperformed the control (0.0 t/ha) with 1036.8 kg/ha, 794.3 kg/ha, and 113.17 g, respectively. Gmelina arborea produced higher (2328.4 kg/ha) cob yield, grain yield (1769.4 kg/ha), and hundred seed weight (150.83 g) compared to Khaya senegalensis (1391.0 kg/ha, 1104.2 kg/ha, and 138.42 g). The findings concluded that Gmelina arborea plantation provides better growing conditions for maize than Khaya senegalensis plantation and maize productivity increases with increase in manure rates irrespective of the plantation. The recommended the combination of higher rates of manure and using fast growing species such as Gmelina arborea as agroforestry based trees for optimum yield of the component crops.

PDF

References

Bello, K. M. (2020). Economic importance of agriculture for poverty reduction in. Decent work and economic growth. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi. /10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_124-1.

Chiaka, J. C., Zhen, L., Yunfeng, H., Xiao, Y., Muhirwa, F., and Lang, T. (2022). Smallholder farmers contribution to food production in Nigeria. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9, 916678.

Deb, S., Bhadoria, P. B. S., Mandal, B., Rakshit, A., and Singh, H. B. (2015). Soil organic carbon: Towards better soil health, productivity and climate change mitigation. Climate change and environmental sustainability, 3(1), 26-34.

Ezenne, G. I., Obalum, S. E., and Tanner, J. (2019). Physical-hydraulic properties of tropical sandy-loam soil in response to rice-husk dust and cattle dung amendments and surface. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64(14), 1746-1754.

Hammad, H. M., Ahmad, A., Wajid, A., and Akhter, J. D. (2011). Maize response to time and rate of nitrogen application. Pak. Journal of Botany 43(4), 1935-1942.

Ignace, D. D., Fassler, A., and Bellemare, J. (2018). Decline of a foundation tree species due to invasive insects will trigger net release of soil organic carbon. Ecosphere, 9(8), e02391.

Kumar, R., Veeraragavan, M., Baral, K., Saikanth, D. R. K., Singh, V., Upadhyay, L., and Raj, S. (2023). Agroforestry and its potential for sustainable Land Management and Climate Action: A. International Journal of Environment and Climate, 13(12), 620-629.

Loncaric, R., Nikolin, I., Ravnjak, B., Nemet, F., Ivezic, V., Milkovic, S. J., and Loncaric, Z. (2022). Model for costs calculation in manure. Book of Proceedings, Economic and Social Development: 65-74.

Naveed, M., Zulekha, R., Khan, K. S., Younas, N., Qadeer, M. F., Brtnicky, M., and Mustafa, A. (2023). Unveiling the potential of acidified cow dung in combination with plant growth promoting endophytes on growth, physiology, and yield improvement of maize in salt-affected. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 16(10), 551.

Shao, Z., Zhang, X., Nasar, J., and Gitari, H. (2024). Synergetic Effect of Potassium, Biochar and Cattle Manure on the Growth and Yield of Maize, and SoilPhysio-Chemical. Plants, 13(23), 3345.

Shettima, M. L (2017). Determination of Some Heavy Metals and Elements in Soil of the College’s Farm College of Agriculture, Maiduguri, North Easthern Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy 5(6-1):17-22 https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJEPP.S.2017050601.13

Sileshi, G. W., Dagar, J. C., Nath, A. J., and Kuntashula, E. (2023). Agroforestry as a climate-smart agriculture: Strategic interventions, current practices and policies. In Agroforestry for sustainable intensification of agriculture in Asia and Africa (pp. 589-640). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

Toungos, D. (2020). Effect of cow dungs rate and sasakawa technology on the performance of maize (Zea mays) in mubi guinea savannah of Nigeria. International Journal of Research-, 8(4), 230-242.

Zarafshar, M., Bazot, S., Matinizadeh, M., Bordbar, S. K., Rousta, M. J., Kooch, Y., and Negahdarsaber, M. (2020). Do tree plantations or cultivated fields have the same ability to maintain soil quality as natural forests?. Applied Soil Ecology, 21(2) 151, 103536.

Zingore, S., Njoroge, S., Ichami, S., Amouzou, K. A., Mutegi, J., Chikowo, R., and Majumdar, K. (2021). The effects of soil organic matter and organic resource management on maize productivity and fertilizer use efficiencies in Africa. Soil Organic Matter and Feeding the Future, 6(4) 127-154.